sheep fodder

"Know that the LORD, he is God! It is he who made us, and we are his; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture." Psalm 100:3

Archive for the ‘Bible’ Category

READING PSALMICALLY

Posted by sheepfodder on March 17, 2009

Credit goes to Justin Buzzard for this great idea:

PSalms

I’ve been changing things up.

Weeks ago I began to notice that my conversations with God had a “stuckness” to them. My prayer life had grown stale and stuck–always saying the same old things in the same old way. So, I decided to change my method.

For the past few weeks I’ve been praying through the Psalms.

This is how I do it:

Most mornings I use my Moleskine in praying through a psalm. Right now, the discipline of writing out my prayers is proving deeply helpful. I began with Psalm 1. Today I prayed through Psalm 20. I use black ink to write out the words of the psalm. As I write the words I pray them to God. When a certain stanza, verse, sentence, or word of the psalm especially grips me and triggers further prayer, I take my red pen and use it to write out/pour out further prayer to God in my own language. When I’m done, I move back to the black pen/psalm.

That’s it. That’s what I do.

It’s just a simple change of method in my prayer life, but this simple change of method is slowly changing how I live and relate to God. I’m living more psalmically than before.

 

Posted in Bible, Pasture Fare | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

TYPOLOGY VERSUS ALLEGORY

Posted by sheepfodder on March 12, 2009

The following is from “Into the Word,” Tabletalk Magazine, March 2009.

“Allegorical interpretation of Scripture is to be rejected because it ultimately strips the text of all meaning. Since allegories can mean something wholly different than what the context allows, there is no way to evaluate different interpretive possibilities. The passage can mean anything, and if it can mean anything, it means nothing and can be misused however one sees fit.

Paul describes his interpretive work in Galatians 4:21-31 with the same Greek word from which we get the English term allegory (v. 24), but he does not embrace fanciful allegories.  Instead, he uses typological interpretation, which, John Calvin writes, is consistent with ‘the true and literal meaning’ of the original text. Typology is based on the fact that God works in recurring patterns throughout history and says that a past event or person can prefigure or serve as a type of a future person or event. In the antitype, a future person or event more fully expresses the truth of what came before. For example, consider the relation of the exodus to the work of Jesus. God’s rescue of his people from Egyptian bondage typifies the greater salvation from slavery to sin and death He accomplished in Christ. The latter work is consistent with the first-in both instances the Almighty Himself rescues a helpless people. But His work also has a fuller meaning, for while people can return to physical slavery, he whom the Son sets free is free indeed, never to be enslaved to evil again (John 8:36).

Typological interpretation can be problematic because too many people call what they are doing typology when they are really employing allegory. Thus, it is generally wise to stick to the typologies explicitly revealed in Scripture.

How do we know that Paul’s reading of the Genesis account is a typology, not an allegory? Remember that Galatians addresses those who attempt to gain the promise of salvation through their own efforts, efforts that enslave people to sin (Galatians 3:10-14). This is precisely what Abraham and the slave-woman Hagar did when they came together to ‘help God along’ and tried to produce the promised heir (Genesis 16:1-6). Paul’s use of Hagar to represent those who try to justify themselves by their deeds is fully harmonious with the Genesis account.”

Posted in Bible | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

MANNA DOESN’T KEEP

Posted by sheepfodder on March 10, 2009

In Exodus, when the children of Israel gather up the manna, the “bread from heaven,” Moses cautions them not to gather too much. They are to gather only as much as they need for that day, confident that tomorrow God would provide for them again. Predictably, the people ignored Moses. They gathered more than they needed, then stashed the rest for another day. But the manna resisted that. If you tried to possess more than you needed for that day, it turned rotten. Manna doesn’t keep.

Jesus said, “I am the bread of life.” Jesus isn’t offering to give us bread; he is offering to be our bread, to be to us what bread is: the sustainer of life. But just as the Israelites could not hoard a lifetime supply of the bread from heaven, so we cannot hoard a lifetime supply of the bread of life.

Some of us are still trying to live on the strength of a religious awakening that happened when we were teenagers, or a Bible study class we took years ago. But manna doesn’t keep. The Israelites couldn’t live off yesterday’s stored-up manna, and we cannot live off yesterday’s stored-up religion. We need to replenish our supply every day.—Lou Lotz, Words of Hope Devotional, March 10, 2009

Posted in Bible, Cud Chews | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

AN IMPREGNABLE FORTRESS

Posted by sheepfodder on February 23, 2009

from The Blazing Center:

 

One who heard us was a woman named Lydia, from the city of Thyatira, a seller of purple goods, who was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what was said by Paul (AC 16.14).

What a miracle is conversion!

Before God opened our hearts we were spiritually dead – darkened, blind, deaf, ignorant and unable to understand the things of God.  Hardened, deceived and enslaved by Satan. We hated God and loved wallowing in the mudpits of our rebellion, flinging God’s word behind us (PS 50.17).

The unregenerate heart is an impregnable fortress.

No amount of human reasoning can crack this stronghold’s walls.  Pleading, begging, or dangling someone over the very pit of hell won’t.  Jonathan Edwards tag teaming with George Whitefield wouldn’t.  Jesus said that even if someone came back from afterlife it wouldn’t convince the wicked heart (LK 16.31).

Unregenerate hearts are invincible – except to Christ.  To break through the bunkers of our blindness and ignorance requires the divine lightning bolt power of the Lord of Hosts.  Charles Spurgeon said that in order to save us, Jesus stormed our hearts like a mighty warrior and demolished every wall opposing him.  But he didn’t stop there.  He gave us new hearts, infused with life and the Spirit of God, new hearts that long for his word, like newborns for milk.

Enlightening the human heart is a miracle of greater magnitude than creation, when God said “Let there be light” (2 CO 4.6).  A miracle even more amazing than when Jesus spoke to Lazarus, who’d been dead and in the tomb for 4 days and raised him to life.

Do you see Jesus as your beautiful God and Savior?  Then praise your Heavenly Father today for his awesome, miraculous power that opened your heart.  And keep praying that Christ will open the hearts of your unsaved friends and family members.  He has the power to tear down the mightiest walls.

photo by Portugese_eyes

Do you still truly think that you chose salvation? ~JB

Posted in Bible, Heavy Duty Fodder | Leave a Comment »

THE MOST IMPORTANT WORD IN THE UNIVERSE

Posted by sheepfodder on February 22, 2009

From Jesus, Keep Me Near the Cross, Nancy Guthrie, Ed. Excerpted from “The Most Important Word in the Universe,” sermon by Raymond C. Ortland Jr.

For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith….” Romans 3:23-25

The word “propitiation” comes from the Latin propitio, meaning “to render favorable, to appease, to conciliate.” To propitiate God means to appease his anger. Propitiation is all about God’s wrath.

God’s wrath? Wait a minute. Is God a fuming, frustrated person? Does he have a temper? Is he subject to mood swings? Is biblical propitiation like the pagan concept of throwing a virgin into the volcano to placate the pineapple god? and what if God changes back to anger? After all, we keep sinning-in the same old ways, too.

The first thing to say is that the wrath of God is a part of the gospel. It’s the part we tend to ignore. Yet we don’t mind our own anger. There is a lot of anger in us, a lot of righteous indignation. Listen to talk radio. In our culture it’s acceptable to vent our moral fervor at one another…. But the thought of God being angry-well, who does he think he is?

Great question. Who is God? He’s the most balanced personality imaginable. He is normal. His wrath is not an irrational outburst. God’s wrath is worthy of God. It is his morally appropriate, carefully considered, justly intense reaction to our evil demeaning his worth and destroying our own capacity to enjoy him. God cares about that. He is not a passive observer. He’s involved emotionally.

The Bible says, “God is love” (1 John 4:8, 16). It never says, “God is anger.” But it couldn’t say that God is love without his anger, because God’s anger shows how serious his love is.

What we must understand is that God’s wrath is perfect, no less perfect than “the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience” (Romans 2:4). His wrath is the solemn determination of a doctor cutting away the cancer that’s killing his patient. And this Doctor hates the cancer. He will rid his universe of it all. He has scheduled a “day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed” (Rom. 2:5).

God presented Christ Jesus as a propitiation by his blood (see Rom. 3:24-35). Do you see the beauty in that? In human religions, it’s the worshiper who placates the offended deity with rituals and sacrifices and bribes. But in the gospel, it’s God himself who provides the offering. At the cross of Christ, God put something forward. He declared something to the whole world. He presented, he displayed, the clearest statement about himself he has ever made. What was he saying? Two things.

One, he detests our evil with all the intensity of the divine personality. If you want to know what your sin deserves from God, don’t look within yourself, don’t look at your own emotions. Look at that man on the cross-tormented, gasping,  bleeding. Take a long, thoughtful look. God was presenting something to you there. God was saying something about his perfect emotions toward your sin. He was displaying his wrath.

Two-here is the other thing God was presenting at the cross-the God you have offended doesn’t demand your blood; he gives his own in Christ Jesus. He knows what you deserve, but he wants to give you what you don’t deserve. He himself has opened the way. He took the initiative. How could it be otherwise? We can’t avert the wrath of God. We’re the problem, not the answer. We’re helpless before God. But “God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son…” (John 3:16). At the cross, his love satisfied his own wrath….

Posted in Bible, Doctrine | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

HE DESCENDED INTO HELL AND ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN

Posted by sheepfodder on February 20, 2009

From Jesus, Keep Me Near the Cross, Nancy Guthrie, Ed. Excerpted from Growing In Christ by J. I. Packer.

“He descended into hell; the third day he rose again from the dead; he ascended into heaven…” -from the Apostles’ Creed

….The English is misleading, for “hell” has changed its sense since the English form of the Creed was fixed. Originally, “hell” meant the place of the departed as such, corresponding to the Greek Hades and the Hebrew Sheol. That is what it means here, where the Creed echoes Peter’s statement that Psalm 16:10, “thou wilt not abandon my soul to Hades” (so RSV: AV has “hell”), was a prophecy fulfilled when Jesus rose (see Acts 2:27-31). But since the seventeenth century, “hell” has been used to signify only the state of final retribution for the godless for which the New Testament name is Gehenna.

What the Creed means, however, is that Jesus entered, not Gehenna, but Hades-that is, that he really died, and that it was a genuine death, not a simulated one, that he rose.

Perhaps it should be said (though one shrinks from laboring something so obvious) that “descended” does not imply that the way from Palestine to Hades is down into the ground, any more than “rose” implies that Jesus returned to surface level up the equivalent of a mine shaft! The language of descent is used because Hades, being the place of the disembodied, is lower in worth and dignity than is life on earth, where body and soul are together and humanity is in that sense whole.

“Being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit” (1 Peter 3:18), Jesus entered Hades, and Scripture tells us briefly what he did there.

First, by his presence he made Hades into Paradise (a place of pleasure) for the penitent thief (cf. Luke 23:43), and presumably for all others who die trusting him during his earthly ministry, just as he does now for the faithful departed (see Philippians 1:21-23; 2 Corinthians 5:6-8).

Second, he perfected the spirits of the Old Testament believers (Hebrews 12:23; cf. 11:40), bringing them out of the gloom which Sheol, the “pit,” had hitherto been for them (cf. Psalm 88:3-6; 10-12), into this same Paradise experience. This is the core of truth in Medieval fantasies of the “harrowing of hell.”

Third, 1 Peter 3:19 tells us that he “made proclamation” (presumably, of his kingdom and appointment as the world’s judge) to the imprisoned “spirits” who had rebelled in antediluvian times (presumably, the fallen angels of 2 Peter 2:4ff., who are also the “sons of God” of Genesis 6:1-4).

What makes Jesus’ entry into Hades important for us is not, however, any of this, but simply the fact that now we can face death knowing that when it comes we shall not find ourselves alone. He has been there before us, and he will see us through….

“He ascended” echoes Jesus’ “I ascend” (John 20:17). “Into heaven” echoes “taken up from you into heaven,” the angels’ words in the ascension story (Acts 1:10). But what is “heaven”? Is it the sky, or outer space? Does the Creed mean that Jesus was the first astronaut? No, both it and the Bible are making a different point.

“Heaven” in the Bible means three things: (1) The endless, self-sustaining life of God.  In this sense, God always dwelt “in  heaven,” even when there was no earth. (2) The state of angels or men as they share the life of God, whether in foretaste now or in fullness hereafter. In this sense, the Christian’s reward, treasure, and inheritance are all “in  heaven” and heaven is shorthand for the Christian’s final hope. (3) The sky, which being above us and more like infinity than anything else we know, is an emblem in space and time of God’s eternal life, just as the rainbow is an emblem of his everlasting covenant (see Genesis 9:8-17).

Bible and Creed proclaim that in the ascension, forty days after his rising, Jesus entered heaven in sense 2-in a new and momentous way: thenceforth he “sitteth on the right hand of God the Father almighty,” ruling all things in his Father’s name and with his Father’s almightiness for the long-term good of his people. “On the right hand of God” signifies not a palatial location but a regal function: see Acts 2:23ff.; Romans 8:34; Ephesians 1:20ff.; Hebrews 1:3, 13; 10:12ff.; 12:2. He “ascended far above the heavens” (that is, reentered his pre-incarnate life, a life unrestricted by anything created) “that he might fill all things” (that is, make his kingly power effective everywhere; see Ephesians 4:10). “Ascended” is, of course, a picture-word implying exaltation (“going up!”) to a condition of supreme dignity and power.

What happened at the ascension, then, was not that Jesus became a spaceman, but that his disciples were shown a sign, just as at the transfiguration. As C. S. Lewis put it, “they saw first a short vertical movement and then a vague luminosity (that is what ‘cloud’ presumably means…) and then nothing.”[1] In other words, Jesus’ final withdrawal from human sight, to rule till he returns to judgment, was presented to the disciples’ outward eye as going up into heaven in sense 3. This should not puzzle us. Withdrawal had to take place somehow, and going up, down, or sideways, failing to appear or suddenly vanishing were the only possible ways. Which would signify most clearly that Jesus would henceforth be reigning in glory? That answers itself. So the message of the ascension story is: Jesus the Savior reigns!

 


[1] C. S. Lewis, Miracles: A Preliminary Study (New York: MacMillan, 1947), 186.

Posted in Bible | Leave a Comment »

DISINFECTING MY MIND

Posted by sheepfodder on February 12, 2009

Stephen Altrogge has some thoughts re Bible reading that are well worth considering:

Several weeks ago I heard someone make the following simple, profound comment:

Christians need to have their minds disinfected every day.

At first this comment sounds somewhat ominous. Disinfected every day? You mean like Big Brother? 1984? Propaganda? Go back to your robots Mr. Thought Police, because I don’t want to have my mind disinfected!

But take a moment to pause and ponder. The truth is, we do need to have our minds spiritually disinfected every day. Each day several things are certain:

  • I’ll be tempted to think “hard thoughts” of God instead of gospel thoughts. My default M.O. is legalism. Trying to earn God’s favor. Fearing the loss of God’s favor when I sin. Doubting the compassion of God. Failing to see the mercy of God in every circumstance.
  • I’ll be tempted to evaluate circumstance based upon my feelings rather than God’s word. Trouble at work with an impossible boss? There’s no good coming from this situation and I need another job. Conflict with your spouse? I’ll never change and there’s no hope for my marriage. Struggling with an overwhelming workload? I hate my life and I hate school.

Let me put this in Biblical terms. In Romans 12:2 Paul says:

Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (emphasis mine)

If I don’t regularly renew my mind with the truth of God’s word, I’ll perpetually operate from one of these mindsets. If I don’t use the gospel to kill hard thoughts of God I’ll wallow in legalism. If I don’t interpret my circumstances through the lens of scripture I’ll miss God’s perspective and be a miserable mess.

Simple application questions:

  • Do you renew your mind on a regular basis by reading, meditating upon, and memorizing the word of God?
  • Do you regularly revisit the gospel?

Posted in Bible | Leave a Comment »