On the Resurrection

from Christians in Context

The Impressive Theologizing of John Updike

Yesterday I was perusing Moe’s Book Store, and happened upon a collection of poems by John Updike. The collection included the poem Seven Stanzas at Easter, which Updike submitted for the Religious Arts Festival at his home church. Not surprisingly, his work won him the $100 first place prize. I’m no literary critic, but I think this poem is outstanding. As you read the stanzas, remember that Updike penned them around 1960, when demythologization was all the rage in New Testament studies. For Bultmann and his ilk, the resurrection was not about the literal vivification of Christ’s body, but the emergence of the church’s faith. Updike is a bold voice, fiercely holding to the literal, bodily resurrection against the tide of scholarly opinion.

 

Make no mistake: if He rose at all
it was as His body;
if the cells’ dissolution did not reverse, the molecules
reknit, the amino acids rekindle,
the Church will fall.

It was not as the flowers,
each soft Spring recurrent;
it was not as His Spirit in the mouths and fuddled
eyes of the eleven apostles;
it was as His flesh: ours.

The same hinged thumbs and toes,
the same valved heart
that–pierced–died, withered, paused, and then
regathered out of enduring Might
new strength to enclose.

Let us not mock God with metaphor,
analogy, sidestepping, transcendence;
making of the event a parable, a sign painted in the
faded credulity of earlier ages:
let us walk through the door.

The stone is rolled back, not papier-mâché,
not a stone in a story,
but the vast rock of materiality that in the slow
grinding of time will eclipse for each of us
the wide light of day.

And if we will have an angel at the tomb,
make it a real angel,
weighty with Max Planck’s quanta, vivid with hair,
opaque in the dawn light, robed in real linen
spun on a definite loom.

Let us not seek to make it less monstrous,
for our own convenience, our own sense of beauty,
lest, awakened in one unthinkable hour, we are
embarrassed by the miracle,
and crushed by remonstrance.

In our day, scholars like Crossan and Borg continue to promulgate the erroneous idea that the resurrection is to be interpreted as only a comforting metaphor, or something like that. Let us be resolute in asserting that the literal resurrection of Christ is utterly necessary for the salvation of souls, and the redemption of the world. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: